On 7/5/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/5/07, The Mangoe the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it's convenient that they could find another source without having to link to the WR thread, but it also seems that the thread is a better source, in spite of the snarky commentary within it.
It can't possibly be a "better source", as none of it is reliable.
Not even the almost blow-by-blow transcript from Brandt of his communications with the various parties?