On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:45 PM, David Katz dkatz2001@gmail.com wrote:
You've also, again, completely evaded your responsibility with Sweet Water Blue. That was an abusive sockpuppet which you used in content disputes and to enable you to vote twice. Can you give some sort of explanation for that sock as well as Jayjg's attempt to cover up its existence by using oversight?
SWB is old news and boring at this point. Water under the bridge, if you will. It may well be that Sarah did something evil and stupid then, but she's not the same person today that she was then. I brought it up only to point out that oversight has made it impossible to fully investigate past activity related to Sarah. I think we should drop that.
I chose to ignore the implication that Lar is some kind of WR sock CU. It's too obviously wrong to be deserving of a comment.