Something else to talk about:
Some of our rather intelligent sciency people seem to have an unusual inability to distinguish science from neutrality. Ultimately, they tend to argue that articles should hold a defacto deference to what is essentially a Scientific Point of View, rather than a Neutral Point of View.
How best to single these people out and correct their behaviour? Any examples of articles in question? Isnt the term "pseudoscience" a POV pejorative from the SPOV?
Stevertigo
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com