Very true. A committee is an animal with four back legs :)
The real problems with the ArbCom all stem from the fact that they arbitrators refuse to get their hands dirty with questions of content. Very properly, since that's not their job and they would doubtless be less than competent at doing so. We really should get some money together for the ArbCom so they can start hiring academics on a consultancy basis to solve their content problems for them.
That's a somewhat far-out solution, but I've become increasingly convinced something like it is necessary.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:57:29 -0700 From: morven@gmail.com To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Christiano Moreschi moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
I take it you object to the fact that "They give a lot of leeway to long term trolls yet they do not give a fraction of that to good standing users." Now, I agree, and they should start banning long-term trolls. Who, I wonder, would be first up against the wall were that to happen?
I suspect quite a lot of users would agree that we should take a harder line on some people; however, I'm not sure that there is wide agreement on WHICH people. One person's troll is another person's unfairly maligned good user, I find.
Arbcom suffers from the well-known and far from unique problems of committees (slow to decide, cautious). However, being quick and rash isn't necessarily the right thing either.
-Matt
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail on your mobile. Text MSN to 63463 now! http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx