On 4/16/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
If you believe new information has come to light, then you should recreate the article and explain your point of view in the edit summary of the creation and on the talk page. If any admin speedies the article after that, then you go to the admin noticeboard and I'm sure you'll find someone willing to undelete it. (A full DRV is not required to undo a speedy deletion.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Daniel_Brand... seems to disagree with your view that a speedy can be undone by any admin. In fact, it seems to suggest that a consensus is required to undo any speedy which isn't "obviously out-of-process".
"While undeletion policy permits admins to reverse an obviously out-of-process deletion, discussion is the more appropriate response when there is disagreement. The proper venue for such discussion is Wikipedia:Deletion review. As a general rule, articles listed there are left deleted at least until a strong consensus begins to emerge in favor of overturning the deletion of the article, or are marked as "temporarily undeleted" if undeletion is necessary so that participants in the review can see the article's contents. Where consensus is unclear, the article should remain deleted until the five-day comment period has elapsed."
Anthony