On Oct 18, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Guettarda wrote:
I see. So saying "obviously you support election fraud" would be appropriate too, and not "needlessly" inflammatory? Interesting.
I don't know how to answer this, except to say this. I have taught freshman composition at a respected university, focusing particularly on research. If one of my students handed me a paper that used those citations in that way, I would fail them. Regardless of whether there was election fraud, the article is a poorly written, POV mess. And it is not the place of Wikipedia to decide if there was election fraud - it's the place of Wikipedia to accurately describe the controversy surrounding it. A controversy that led to no successful challenges to the outcome of the election, and no lasting media coverage. Instead of this, though, we have 60,000 words of original research.
-Snowspinner