Dan Tobias wrote:
People who oppose me in the "BADSITES" debate have been doing quite a bit of imputing of motives, blackening of reputations, and the like, which is ironic coming from the side that's supposedly against personal attacks.
Dan, it's very simple. Try to keep up.
1. We must do everything possible to protect editors from harm. 2. A BADSITES-like policy would protect editors from harm. 3. Dan Tobias is against BADSITES-like policies. 4. Therefore, squelching Dan Tobias protects editors from harm.
I don't see how you can be against step 4. I guess you're not interested in protecting Wikipedia's editors.