On 12/4/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
It's newbie-biting, and it's putting too much meaning into a simple google search. The process is apparently this: single editor finds material that looks like a cut-and-paste job, does google, finds copy. Source doesn't look to single editor like a GFDL source, so single editor without consulting a single other human being deletes the article.
Why is it not enough to have more than one person make the decision, and the decision to be made over a reasonable period?
I've seen all kinds of excuses, but not explanation of why this extension is needed. It almost seems to me like a CSD proposal deliberately crafted to delete articles that do not infringe copyright.
As I recall, I agreed with you...
-- Sam