Oldak Quill wrote:
The episode is a source, the problem is whether we should be using primary sources like this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary_and_seco... says:
"An article or section of an article that relies on primary source should (1) only make descriptive claims the accuracy of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable adult without specialist knowledge, and (2) make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims."
So it looks to me like a straight synopsis of the events depicted in a TV episode easily fits that bill and is not considered original research.