Fastfission wrote:
Since Bridgeman v. Corel currently IS the law (whether the archivists like it or not) and has BEEN the law for the past six years, I think we shouldn't be too worried about using it. In any event, if something horrible happened which changed the legal situation we can always go back over the images tagged as such and delete them.
While I am of course sympathetic, it bears repeating that Bridgeman v. Corel is *not* binding authority, as it was merely a district court case.