On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:02:07 -0600, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
What, you mean Angela freely states that she was born on X date in X hospital, and we have the record, and they still won't let it in?
Not quite in that level of detail (I don't think she's identified what hospital she was born in and I haven't registered for an account with ancestry.co.uk to view the details it gives), but along those lines.
Ah, right. So it *is* a matter of editors joining the dots from disjoint facts, rather than a citation to support a fact available from another source. Not surprising it's been removed, then. Seems a bit [[WP:STALK]]ish anyway. Who cares?
Guy (JzG)