I'd also like to add that I have had no problems with Susan Mason or Dietary Fiber on the two articles I was watching, that is, "James I of England" and "History of Soviet Union". They were called trolls, they were told to "go get a history book", and they were told repeatedly that their views are wrong. The facts that I did check were correct, and Susan Mason offered to cooperate. When someone said that "regime" explains the Soviet Union better than "government", Susan Mason referred to a dictionary entry, and I noticed that other online dictionaries both say that regime means "the government in power". I told those who had complaints against Susan Mason that they could make their case stronger by outlining which facts and sentences Susan Mason was using were incorrect. Then they could (theoretically) make a compromise, after doing some fact-checking. Instead, I was told that Susan Mason is lying and only pretends to cooperate, and that I was well-meaning but naive. Any posts by Susan Mason were reverted immediately. See archived talk page for History of Soviet Union, and my talk page.
--cprompt