-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell webmaster@davidarussell.co.uk wrote:
So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
- elements of erotica,
- and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify those inclusions.
Your criteria are ridiculous. You know how much perfectly legal anime (which airs on Cartoon Network, among other things) you just made "illegal" with your broad brush stroke?
Am I the only one who finds it ludicrous to talk about whether a drawn image on a piece of paper looks like it is depicting someone over the age of 18?!
- -- Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")
~ Sub veste quisque nudus est ~