On 10/26/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/26/05, Anthony DiPierro wikispam@inbox.org wrote:
Supports what consensus? I just said, if people can't come to a general agreement, then there *is* no consensus. You seem to be mistaking
majority
with consensus.
General aggreement isn't going to happen any more on anything. As such in order to get things done we have to shift over to super majority. If you don't like this go and join a smaller project.
-- geni
Like I said, I can come to accept it if the process is changed from consensus to majority rule. If you think Wikipedia should drop consensus as a goal, by all means make that argument. What I don't accept is redefining the term consensus to mean majority rule. Anthony