Jtkiefer jtkiefer@wordzen.net wrote: Keith Old wrote:
People should give serious thought to the consequences of such actions before they post. All that would happen is that we would end up with one hell of a mess.
In any case, those people who are so concerned about AfD should come up with a serious proposal that would work better. As yet, I have not seen such a proposal.
Regards
*Keith Old*
User: Capitalistroadster
Ok, if someone comes up with a serious proposal then I'll voice my nay or aye on it but the thought of entirely turning off AFD for even a short period of time is ludicrious.
-Jtkiefer _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l At the risk of being a bore on this topic, I think Uncontested Deletions has some potential as a way to reduce the volume at AFD....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_reform/Proposals/Uncontested...
"According to DragonsflightÂ’s 100 days survey, 58.2% of all AFD nominations resulted in uncontested deletions. No one, not even the creator, voted to keep those articles."
I'm not proposing this as a total replacement of AFD however....