Well, taking a first stab at this. Here's my letter to Wired: ----
Per the recent New York Times admission that one of your editors plagiarized content from Wikipedia uncredited, I respectfully request credit for media work of mine that Wired has reproduced without credit.
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/editor-of-wired-apologizes-...
This reproduces a photograph in the digitally restored version I generated through painstaking restoration:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sfearthquake3b.jpg
My restoration of this image was selected as a "featured picture", which designates Wikipedia's best content. It ran on Wikipedia's main page on 16 March 2008: one month before your uncredited reproduction of my volunteer labor.
I seek no compensation other than credit. Please post credit as follows: "Restoration by Lise Broer (Durova)".
Thank you very much,
Lise Broer
San Diego, California.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com wrote:
Slight correction. It was Time Magazine that ran my Brandeis restoration uncredited. The one Wired ran uncredited was the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906.
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/04/dayintech_0418
Wired gives sole credit to the original source: *Image: H.D. Chadwick/National Archives and Records Administration* * *
Here's my restoration: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sfearthquake3b.jpg
The unrestored version: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sfearthquake3.jpg
Any suggestions what to do about this?
-Lise
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:57 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/24 Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com:
Wired also used one of my featured picture restorations without credit.
Credit for the original, or credit for the restoration?
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l