Thomas Dalton wrote:
What is wrong with 'move on' as a form of dispute resolution? Beats vendetta and vindictiveness any day.
It's simply resolving the dispute by accepting defeat. In some cases, the dispute may be so trivial that it's easier to simply let the other person win, but not always.
Of course, when the offending party is the one saying "move on," it's just as bad as saying "I don't really care if what I did bothered you, I didn't do anything wrong."
-Jeff