[I'm replying both to the list and directly to Louis.]
Louis Kyu Won Ryu wrote:
Recently, Adam Carr contributed a well-researched writeup about Wikipedia article quality. It has since been moved to the meta. I am concerned that it will receive little attention on the meta, because relatively few Wikipedians read the meta, and those few that do are not representative of the community.
Time was, people put this stuff on subpages of their user page. That should still be kosher; and it's more accessible than [[meta:]].
I'm assuming that his write-up really was specific to [[en:]]. If it was general, then [[meta:]] may yet be the best place for it.
-- Toby