I recently came across the following article: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Sylvia_Browne_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Sylvia_Browne) . To get you up to speed, Sylvia Browne is a self-professed psychic. Invevitably, James Randi is not impressed. Neither is Danny.
On the other hand, does this merit an article. She is an LP, so this is essentially a "Criticisms of a BLP" article. On the other hand, it is quite well-sourced, at least from a perfunctory glance at it.
Still, do we want to open the door to these kinds of articles? Criticisms of Sylvia Browne could lead to Criticisms of Uri Geller to Criticisms of George Bush to Criticisms of Tom Cruise to Criticisms of [pick your favorite]. The very hypothesis of the article is POV. Surely, this is not what we are here for.
I'd really like some input. Ideally, it should be merged, but the precedent this poses should also be mentioned.
Danny
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.