Oldak Quill wrote:
On 20/07/06, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
So even though almost no one now supports the name "Limited-access roads", including several who also commented in the original CFD, it is kept there because of a vote-counter. I fail to see why we have chosen to operate this way - there is certainly not consensus to keep it there. If I choose to ignore all rules I will probably be banned for violating my probation against "provocative edits". But the current name does not correctly describe the purpose of the category.
I didn't understand why you didn't just move the category until that mention of "provocative edits". I'd happily move the category for you, if no one objects?
It would probably be reverted by someone opposing it, who would use the "no consensus" and the way CFD works to enforce it. Then if I tried to revert we'd get a revert war on 20 or so pages.