On 9/15/05, Tony Sidaway minorityreport@bluebottle.com wrote:
Phroziac wrote:
"They're halfway decent stubs, but we really don't need a lot of one line articles, and we probably really didn't loose anything by deleting them."
We probably should not be speedying "halfway decent stubs". Speedy deletion is supposedly for complete junk, stuff that cannot be salvaged by editing because it shouldn't be on Wikipedia in the first place. Thanks for undeleting the Alberta lake one.
The very thought of speedying a halfway decent stub strikes me as both a very bad idea, and very dangerous to the encyclopaedia. How many featured articles started out as stubs?