For a tad more privacy, but something that remain available should anyone need it, what about putting in on a subpage, deleting the subpage, and then putting an "admins only" link (ie, any admin can access it, so the permission stays with the project even if you leave, but it is not openly available to the public.
Just a thought.
Ian
On 8/31/05, Nick Boalch n.g.boalch@durham.ac.uk wrote:
Theresa Knott wrote:
What is the prevailing etiquette on what to do with positive responses to requests for confirmation of licensing permission?
I think as long as you remove the IP, the email address and other sensitive info, I doubt that anyone would object to the email being copied to the talk page would they?
No, I can't imagine they would -- but if this sensitive info is removed then there's essentially no difference between an emailed authorisation and a random anonymous editor on the talk page claiming to be the author. Is my word that the confirmation was real enough?
Cheers,
N.
-- Nicholas Boalch School of Modern Languages & Cultures Tel: +44 (0) 191 334 3420 University of Durham Fax: +44 (0) 191 334 3421 New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT, UK WWW: http://nick.frejol.org/
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l