"Jimmy Wales" jwales@bomis.com schrieb:
You're making the argument that since someday, some lonely person might have enough freetime to waste typing in thousands and thousands of entries in the manner of a robot, we have to delete any and every article that's too trivial today.
I think that are some missing steps in that deduction, so that the conclusion does not follow from the premises.
I'll add the missing steps:
Either these articles are having a positive effect on Wikipedia, and then we should allow this hypothetical person or a bot, not ban them. Or these articles are having a negative effect on Wikipedia, and then it's good thing to delete them.
Andre Engels