Yet it has more lives than I have sockpuppets. It doesn't always appear in the same form, but every time you turn around, some overzealous editor is pushing to enforce an issue which is, essentially, the same as the rejected "attack sites" policy.
Fred Bauder wrote:
Rejected by the community.
Fred
-----Original Message----- From: Fred Bauder [mailto:fredbaud@waterwiki.info] Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 11:31 AM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkkkk site link policy
So what happened to the attack sites proposal? (I was busy doing other things)
Fred
-----Original Message----- From: The Mangoe [mailto:the.mangoe@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 11:02 AM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
Perhaps you have forgotten then that the "attack sites" proposal was directed at it.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l