On 23/02/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
I don't know. I find the whole "its free but its not free" debate in photographs, entirely pointlessly [[WP:POINT]] pointy.
It doesn't help our project to be legalistic about what pictures we can and cannot use internally.
If some photographer has an issue with our use, *they* should be the one to come and point it out and we'd remove the use. Internal cat-fights over this, based on microscopic views of the terms is really distracting.
That's my opinion of the matter.
Will Johnson
This would be the youtube method. Unlike youtube however we aim to be free content something not consistent with hosting large numbers of blatant copyvios. We care about copyright and this means we require certain standards.