On 05/07/07, David Goodman dgoodmanny@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I am mistake, hasn't it been stated above that the ruling only applied to ED, but yet KM was apparently blocked for linking to WR. KM's edit summary n inserting the links was "vague ArbCom statements from 8 months ago aren't policy. that ArbCom case pertained to ED and the links were being used for harassment. this link is genuinely informative." http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essjay_controversy&diff=next&a... and on examining what was inserted, no confidential or abusive material was linked to.
I predict you will see no substantive answer to this - the edit has been retrospectively declared a "breaching experiment", much as the person who edited WP:BADSITES to read *as it is now being applied* has been retrospectively declared to have been trolling to sabotage it.
- d.