Gutza as usual is correct, and I apologise for even commenting at all. All in good fun --if not good taste. I read about half of that discussion list, and it seems like the typical conversation about wiki -- is it a valid source? How can it be trusted. etc. A very enlightening thread actually, looking at uninitiated newbies juggling the same paradoxical concept that we all still deal with -- namely 'despite the fact that it shouldnt work at all it does.' [paraphrasing Jimbo]
-S-
--- Gutza gutza@moongate.ro wrote:
I think banning him would probably prove the point that Wikipedia isn't completely unregulated. But then again, it would probably also prove that we're fascists to such a person. Not banning him would prove him that Wikipedia is unreliable. Talking about him proves that we're a bunch of losers who have nothing better to do. So I think ignoring the guy would probably be the best thing to do, along with keeping an eye on his IP and reverting his changes, should some more occur in the future.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com