On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:11:11 +0100, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
We won't stop before we get precisely what we want either.
Which is a verifiably neutral encyclopaedia. And that's bad because?....
Well it shows, that you and your opponents share the determination. It would be bad, if determination turns to fanaticism and leads to collateral damage (editors who get blocked, just because they have a different view on what a verifiably neutral encyclopaedia should look like).
Have you ever actually looked at Wikipedia Review? Just curious.
Guy (JzG)