Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Puppy wrote:
<snip>
This is not to say that improving and expanding such articles is not desirable - after all, we wish to be the premier source of general information on everything - but it is not due to gender bias, and to imply that it is to me is reinforcing the "woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person".
Actually, your argument here is serving /that/ purpose quite well.
? Either I'm misunderstanding you, or I've just been insulted. -kc-