LittleDan-
You mean the content is offensive? I think sexually explicit material falls into a fundimentally different category. Plus, the [[Christianity]] page doesn't say, "Jesus Christ is our savior and he will eventualy come back to smite all of the people who aren't good christians" (sorry, I don't know much about christianity, I'm jewish). All it says is different opinions of different sects of christianity (hopefully) and doesn't present any as fact. If christianity is offensive, then so are half the articles in wikipedia. Just think of World Book, the current school encyclopedia almost everywhere. They report on Christianity, but they don't contain sexually explicit images. If we start to allow this, then who knows how far it will snowball?
You're missing my point. My point is that, from an NPOV perspective, sexually explicit content is no different than any other content. It may offend some people, it may be desired by other people. Singling out sexualy explicit content for filtering would be a POV decision on our part, as we would be explicitly supporting filtering in this instance, but in no other. If we implement any filtering, it should be applicable to all types of content.
Regards,
Erik