How did that happen without me knowing about it? Anyway, the "key step of superceding WP:RS" as someone called it can only be done if it's included in the page. You don't want people to cite any random website.
Mgm
On 3/1/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Rob Smith wrote:
On 2/28/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
The aim was to get rid of the word "verifiability." This was causing confusion for new editors because they thought it meant they had to check that material was true, which is what "verify" usually means, rather than simply checking that it had been published elsewhere.
Hmm. The Latin root of verify means "true"; amazing the policy read "verifiable, not true". Like in the English language, just what the hell did that ever mean, anyway?
What is verifiable is what was actually said; that implies nothing about the substantive truth of the statement. It allows us to maintain NPOV by including verifiable but contradictory statements on both sides of an issue. Only rarely are they both true.
Ec
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l