On 8/1/07, John Lee johnleemk@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/2/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/1/07, John Lee johnleemk@gmail.com wrote:
If I knew nothing about SV and her Wikipedia history, I would at least expect my n00b question of "SV, what's this on /. about you supposedly
being
some sort of spy?" or my n00b statement of fact like "SV, there's this
silly
thing on /. about you being a secret agent" to be responded to civilly,
with
at least a brief explanation, rather than having them being removed from
the
talk page without a trace,
If Wikipedia Review started alleging you were a pedophile, do you imagine you respond civilly to questions of "John, what's all this about you being a pedophile"?
Well, I would certainly laugh it off as the usual bullshit stunts these people pull. I would not demand that we salt the earth as if nobody ever made such allegations.
I don't see anyone making such demands, though.
and people going around asking for revisions with
my question to be oversighted.
Who asked for reversions to be oversighted? If I missed those posts, I apologize, but I don't recall seeing people ask for that.
David Gerard posted about being asked to do it. He told them to bugger off.
I've looked at David's post; that's not what he said.