The wikipedia may have a neutrality policy, but it hasn't many teeth, and some POV's seem alot more equal than others. Two that I have run up against time and time again are the Socialist POV (socialism has never been implemented, most socialists define socialism like I do, etc...) and the Pathological Skeptic POV (Humans are an ape, God is just one diety among many, most scientists agree w me, etc...) Instead of the collective editing process minimizing the insistance of these editors to remove cited facts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=God&diff=46806965&oldid=46...
and to make unsubstantiated claims:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Socialism#Unsubstantiated_claims
majoritocracy and oligarchic admins who shoot from the hip seem to have the final say, trumping NPOV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sam_Spade
The wikipedia needs to make some changes. Either rewrite NPOV to reflect those biases welcomed by the project, or find a way to enforce neutrality which works, i.e. not popularity contests.
SS