Your contention was considered by the arbitration committee and rejected; both offenders were blocked, if by different people. You are in the same position as someone who is caught and disciplined then claims, "No fair, so and so was doing it too and was not punished as quickly as I was." You are an administrator and expected to more or less follow Wikipedia policies and if you can't or won't ought to gracefully accept the consequences.
Geni is to be commended, not "suffer a penalty"!
Fred
On Nov 4, 2005, at 12:14 AM, steve v wrote:
--- geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
I think the somunity made it's feelings pretty clear at the RFC but no matter.
You are the second admin to end up on arbcom after pulling a 3RR block I placed on them, In neither
case > has arbcom had the guts to make a straight descission.
Wait a minute. Everybody agrees that the ruling lacked decisiveness, but to say the Arbcom lacks "the guts" is over the line and nothing short of a personal attack.
And since were on the subject, though youre a relative newbie, theres no excuse for you to have failed to apply 3RR properly, meaning you should have blocked CJK too.
What penalty should you suffer for making an improper block in the first place? I would prefer to just let that go, but my time in the stocks and your own "lacking" (of accountability), has soured my impression of you.
Stevertigo
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l