--- Justin Cormack justin@specialbusservice.com wrote:
Best thing is to make it a featured article, it will get on the front page fast.
Its been on the front page for two or three days now.
But I am in the UK so not like used to freedom or stuff so what do I know.
OK, I wasnt sure. Ive never been there. Ive heard you guys have lots of Starbucks' popping up though.
Stevertigo, the UK press normally ignore official
secrets act "gagging".
There is a public interest defence. Sometimes
someone goes to prison its true.
Thats good to know. I had thought all the brave people were here in the USA.
--- geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Erm no we don't. We don't have a history of
deferring to anyone.
OK, fine -- have it your way.
We don't know that there are other posible reasons
for the offcial secrets act kicking in.
Youre right -- there could be other valid reasons for suppressing a document which describes a conversation between public officials about committing terrorism against private citizens of a friendly state. We should just defer to the wisdom of the Krown.
Public domain? I doubt it. Crown copyright perhaps.
Well then she could just send us a takedown notice and we'll immediately obey, offering to polish the crown jewels if she likes as a peace offering.
Stevertigo
__________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/