jayjg wrote:
"Undisclosed reasons". LOL! More dark conspiracies, no doubt.
I'm going to be blunt and open. Nearly everything you do is related to an agenda of some sort. This is blindingly obvious to anyone who has ever tried to work with you on an article or policy issue. Period.
I can't pinpoint the angle you are working here, but judging by your history, it's a fairly safe bet that you've got something to show. It doesn't seem like you are really concerned about this editor using tor because of policy reasons. It's pretty apparent that something else is up, but nobody can exactly say what.
Thus, I have to concede that you violated the CheckUser policy for an undisclosed reason. The result, at least at the moment, is that this is the second RFA you and your cohorts have torpedoed in relation to the open proxy nonissue (although, granted, in the first RFA this stunt was pulled on the editor had a history of incivility, was thus a poor candidate for adminship, and as a result, nobody paid much attention to you and slimvirgin et al harping on the open proxy nonissue.)