On Nov 27, 2007 10:38 AM, joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu wrote:
No. While that on occasion make sense, very often additional evidence is by itself sufficient. For example, some users have certain grammatical quirks and spelling issues. For example I frequently write "payed" when the word is in fact "paid". Without going into too much detail (not wanting to give banned users too much info here) such signs when used with other evidence can be very definitive. In such cases a sanity check from another admin might be a good thing, but very often there's no need to email the user.
I was meaning in the case, such as this, where there is nothing definitive tying someone to a specific banned user but one has suspicions.
-Matt