On Sat, 15 May 2004, Charles Matthews wrote:
No, that's wrong. It's wrong for Wik. It's wrong for RickK. We need enforcement on WP; but we do not need anyone who strides around on the basis that they're involved in carrying it out.
Are you sure you mean "RickK" & didn't mean "RK"? While I don't claim to agree with everything RickK has contributed, I believe he's far less controversial than RK.
Geoff