On 10/16/07, Christiano Moreschi moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
In all fairness, this is probably a consequence of RFA's culture of "must use 100 percent edit summaries before passing"!
Which of course is possible only if you used edit summaries from jumpstreet (edit number 1) which few people do.
Sometimes I wonder how these RFA "requirements" originated? Who was the first to oppose for lack of edit summaries, who was the first to oppose for no work in project space? These were the ones that the rest of the "voters" joined in on.
It's interesting that sometimes someone tries to start an RFA "requirement" only to get jumped on by the rest of the "voters". Some of these are opposes for "wiki breaks" and "self noms".