On 4/27/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/27/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
On 4/26/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/25/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Two of the arbitrators involved in that decision (Fred and Jay) confirmed during a recent request for clarification that the rulings applied to any attack site, not just to ED ...
Having said that, the BADSITES proposal was probably unnecessary, and it attracted the attention of editors who want to be able to link to those sites because they post on them, which led to a lot of pointless fighting. I think it's a better idea to have a sentence or two about attack sites in NPA or the blocking policy.
I think the whole thing was phony. It served as a platform for them, so they could argue their points.
I agree. They had a field day.
It had a very strong [[straw man]] feel.