Nathan J. Yoder (njyoder@energon.org) [050704 06:09]:
Obviously there was no consensus that these editors were trustworthy; someone is not "trustworthy" simply because you believe them to be so. And consensus is still an important part of the Wikipedia process.
How is a majority vote NOT consensus?
The idea is that an overwhelming majority may *indicate* consensus. For RFA, that's taken to mean >80%; 75-80% is at bureaucrat discretion.
- d.