Rhobite wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:48:02 -0800, Michael Snow wikipedia@earthlink.net wrote:
However, we do have a longstanding serious problem in that there are fundamentally *way too many* pages in the Wikipedia namespace.
I don't really know where to propose it, but I've been thinking about this one for a while. I believe there are too many choices for "problem resolution" pages, particularly pages in the Wikipedia: namespace designed to list articles which need to improve in some way. This includes Cleanup, Pages Needing Attention, Peer Review, and Requests for Expansion. I think PNA is particularly redundant with Cleanup, and PNA should be phased out. Four months ago I was a newbie and I had no idea what the difference was between those pages. I'm still a little unsure about PNA vs. Cleanup.
Rhobite
I've been editing since September 2003, and I still don't know the difference between PNA and Cleanup. :-P
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])