Thomas Dalton wrote:
It's a pretty clear single-incident bio - [[WP:BLP1E]].
Is it, though? What is the single-incident? The story breaking? In which case, we end up with news coverage being the story rather than covering the story, and everything goes haywire (we only have primary sources, for a start, which suggests it's not notable). If she's notable, it's for a series of crimes and a spell as COO of WMF, not for a single incident, thus she should get her own article, rather than there being an article on the story.
Viewed in that light, I'd say she probably isn't notable. Consider the "Will anyone care in X amount of time?" approach - I'd say the answer is "no" for quite small values of X (6 months, or so).
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I'd say she's worth two or three lines on the Wikimedia Foundation article at most. A bio? No chance. Not unless she turn out to be Jimbo's long-lost sister and goes on to cure cancer.
Other than the fact she has a criminal record she's not notable - the notability (if any) is in what the Foundation did (or failed to do), and the media commentary is all on that. The media are not even interested in her, but in WMF, there's little chance of her autobiography becoming a mini-series.
However, having said all of that, do we really need the publicity and the crappy calls of 'censorship' that a DRV entails. Let the bio be created, and then merge it with WMF in a month or two.
Doc