--- Mark Wagner carnildo@gmail.com wrote:
Bad idea. I don't know about other admins, but I use rollback for things other than vandalism and linkspam, such as widespread implementations of bad ideas. Most recent case: someone had modified the wording of about three dozen stub templates in a way that implied that a particular wikiproject had ownership over the articles in question.
How is that a bad idea? The page history is for showing how an article developed. If a bit of text is no longer in the article due to a revert for any purpose, then the edit that added it and the edit that removed it need not be there forever. A week is long enough. In addition to removing vandalism, the above idea would also help to de-clutter page histories.
-- mav
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com