In a message dated 4/23/2009 5:59:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk writes:
On a related note, an interesting issue I came across the other day is where my limited primary research - a detail found when I was trying to confirm something else - appears to *explicitly* contradict the secondary sources. What d'you do there?
a) Leave it alone, and put a note on the talkpage? b) Quote the standard interpretation of things, add a footnote about the odd result? c) Decide the secondary sources are wrong, quote the primary source?>>
-------------------
Andrew I agree with you, I like B) myself as well.
Will Johnson
************** Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219799634x1201361008/aol?redir=http... eclick.net%2Fclk%3B214133440%3B36002254%3Bj)