Justin Cormack wrote:
On 19 May 2006, at 11:54, geni wrote:
On 5/19/06, Justin Cormack justin@specialbusservice.com wrote:
Dont get attached to fair use. Its not part of our mission. It will all be gone in a few years at the latest. Dont bother defending it.
Justinc
Company logos Certian historic images Movie screenshot.
company logos are fairly harmless, except where they are being used as decoration, when we can get rid of them.
I agree that a few of the historic images are worth keeping, the ones which have articles.
How is this consistent with your initial declaration that "it will all be gone in a few years"? Either fair use is sometimes acceptable or never acceptable - even one fair use image, no matter how much it is "worth keeping", makes en: non-free.
And of course if you admit the principle that some nonfree images are allowable, you've reduced it to a matter of personal opinion as to whether any class of nonfree image is worth including. Every class of image now accepted has a number of respected editors who support including that class.
Stan