On 7/16/07, John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
The equivalent template for "Album cover" has been shot down, but I would like to see the logo template stick around as it isnt as contentious or problematic.
It's not been shot down. It's simply contentious. Based on precedent, it's likely to remain so. It's currently in use on 255 images.
The contention on this template centers, in part, in the never ending debate (as mentioned earlier in this thread) of whether identification is enough for our purposes or if the fair use image must have critical commentary on it as well. This has never been decidedly answered one way or another, and remains a massive point of contention.
Just all part of the ongoing, never ending series of disputes over this. For another example, see http://www.motokoaoyama.com/2007/06/26/they-might-as-well-call-it-nazipedia-...
-Durin