That was hardly my point. There was never any suggestion of abandoning NPOV. How do you get that from a call for statistical information? Suggesting that no-one who makes an OTRS complaint is ever successful stretches credibility.
Ec
Jimmy Wales wrote:
I think the answer, throughout the entire history of Wikipedia, is 0% "capitulation".
NPOV is non-negotiable. As ever.
On Jul 8, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
Kat Walsh wrote:
A lot of people say that every time they hear about OTRS it's because of some big frustrating action. This is largely because the small undramatic actions or the ones where the people writing are told "sorry, we don't do that" -- or the ones where people get into tense 20-message exchanges that amount to "sorry, we don't do that" -- no one hears about those.
Would it be feasible to periodically publish OTRS statistics? Something that appears, for example, as 80% refusal, 19% negotiation, 1% capitulation could give a clearer picture.