It's perfect nonsense for Wikipedia Review to come up with, really, accusing someone of being a secret agent is one of those heffalump traps. If you say you're not a secret agent, it's obvious you are, if you say you are a secret agent, you're bluffing. We've stumbled into the twilight zone of conspiracy theorists now. I'd pour yourselves a large drink, put your feet up and chuckle away at the sheer stupidity and naivety of anybody who believes these.
On 27/07/07, Brock Weller brock.weller@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I never see covered by Brandt and co. is even if this is true, does it matter? Seriously. We have people who have all sorts of jobs working on the wiki, most of whom know how to leave bias's at the door. Slim's one of my favorite admin, a little short at times, but incredibly dedicated and wholly appropriate. Even where I disagree with her (WP:ATT for one) it stems from a difference of opinion, not me thinking she's evil. Theres not any real evidence for any of these claims, true, but even if they were, who the hell cares? The WR crowd always assumes this is some major bombshell.
On 7/27/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 7/27/07, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/27/1943254 is currently
on
the front page, along with the text "It turns out that a Wikipedia administrator named SlimVirgin is actually Linda Mack..." Looks like outing to me.
It's only outing if it's true, and apparently it isn't.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- -Brock _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l