According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:RFA/SV, I have restored Stevertigo sysop status.
...
Ant
Anthere wrote:
Dear fellow wikipedians,
Yesterday, stewards received a request to unsysop Stevertigo, after a failed reconfirmation of sysophood, following an arbcom decision.
Jtkiefer also asked me privately by irc to carry on the request.
I consequently unsyoped Stevertigo.
Today, Steve post on my talk page, this comment : http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthere#Request_for_permissions
As a reminder, stewards are not here to judge, but to carry on the decision of the community. I have no idea why Steve was brought in front of the arbcom (well, right, it is a 3RR issue, but I do not know the details, and I do not want to get in this).
Now, I think in this case, the "judges" are
- the arbcom
- the voting community
And the steward is just to carry on the decision the "judges" made.
If there is something unclear in the final decision, it should not be my job to go reading all the discussions around this case, so as to figure out myself the "correct" conclusion. I think Stevertigo is a honest editor, and he would not try to cheat on the decision, so if he feels the outcome has not been fair/clear, it is probable that there is a little something unclear somewhere.
So, what I would like you to do, is to clarify the current situation, so that the correct decision, to desysop or not to desysop, is taken.
I give it 48 hours without doing anything, and if there is no clarification by then, I will revert to the previous stable situation (ie, Steve sysop) till an agreement is reached between yourselves.
Ant
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l